After the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (<a href="https://finbold.com/topic/sec/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">SEC</a>) filed a new argument to support its summary judgment motion in the widely publicized and prolonged <a href="https://finbold.com/ripple-v-sec-case-update-as-of-april-10-2023/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">lawsuit</a> against <a href="https://finbold.com/topic/ripple/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Ripple</a>, the <a href="https://finbold.com/topic/blockchain/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">blockchain</a> company’s legal team refused to stay silent and filed its own argument contradicting the SEC’s reasoning.Specifically, Ripple’s lawyer Michael K. Kellogg wrote a response arguing that the proceedings from the Commonwealth case to which the <a href="https://finbold.com/category/regulations-news/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">regulator</a> was referring in the argument were irrelevant to Ripple and the <a href="https://finbold.com/cryptocurrency/xrp/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">XRP token</a>, as shared by a defense lawyer and popular commentator on the case, James K. Filan, in a <a href="https://twitter.com/FilanLaw/status/1646623155488714762" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">tweet</a> on April 13.<img src="https://academy-public.coinmarketcap.com/srd-optimized-uploads/3ad558fad8b0470d9d6a316a6f1c0677.PNG" />As a reminder, the SEC’s legal team earlier <a href="https://finbold.com/massive-ripple-court-case-update-sec-reveals-key-arguments/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">filed</a> a letter of supplemental authority in further support of its summary judgment motion, in which it referred to a District of Massachusetts court’s decision denying the defendants ‘fair notice’ argument and siding with the <a href="https://finbold.com/guides/finance/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">financial</a> watchdog in a <a href="https://finbold.com/topic/securities/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">securities</a> fraud case, as <a href="https://finbold.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Finbold</a> reported on April 12.<h2 id="header-0">Irrelevant to Ripple and XRP</h2>However, Kellogg argued that the decision, which he referred to as “an out-of-circuit, unpublished district court opinion,” was irrelevant to the current case, as Ripple had “abundant evidence (…) showing that reasonable market participants, trying to understand what the SEC would permit or prohibit, concluded that Defendants’ offers and sales of <a href="https://finbold.com/guide/how-to-buy-ripple-xrp/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">XRP</a> were not ‘<a href="https://finbold.com/guides/investing/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">investment</a> contracts,’ and told the SEC so.”<blockquote>“There is also abundant evidence that the SEC was not only aware of the widespread regulatory confusion but helped to sow it by repeatedly offering (and then disclaiming) vague guidance that differed from the Howey test,” he added.</blockquote>By comparison, in the Commonwealth case, “the defendant adduced no contemporaneous evidence supporting its defense that market participants lacked fair notice of an obligation to disclose economic conflicts of interest (…). It merely quoted SEC guidance and presented a paid expert who opined that he believes (in retrospect) that the guidance did not require certain disclosures. (…) The ‘clear directive’ from Commonwealth is absent here.”Finally, Ripple’s counsel took a jab at the regulator’s brag of other court decisions throwing out the defendants’ ‘fair notice’ arguments, stressing again that they had nothing to do with the case against Ripple:<blockquote>“The SEC’s boast of the ‘unbroken chain of district court decisions rejecting fair notice defenses, on summary judgment, in SEC enforcement actions’ is irrelevant. (…) The Court has already rejected the SEC’s reliance on these cases.”</blockquote><h2 id="header-1">Widespread support</h2>Indeed, Kellogg’s opinion is shared by other legal connoisseurs, including lawyer Bill Morgan, who pointed out there were no similarities between the two cases, while <a href="https://finbold.com/guides/banking/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">banking</a> law expert Todd Phillips singled out the use of the Howey Test as problematic in determining what is or isn’t an investment contract.Meanwhile, the XRP community, in general, seems to be optimistic about the outcome of the case, as the price of the digital asset has increased by 3.96% in the last 24 hours, in addition to gaining 4.99% during the previous week, and 40.97% on its monthly chart, according to the data retrieved on April 14.Read more cryptocurrency news on <a href="https://finbold.com/category/cryptocurrency-news/?utm_source&#61;CMC&amp;utm_medium&#61;social&amp;utm_campaign&#61;CMC&amp;utm_content&#61;long" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Finbold.com</a>.

Ripple’s latest court response to SEC packs a punch

목차

Finbold

2023년 4월 20일에 게재된 다른 기사

Internet Computer Plans for Hub in Hong Kong

Why is Rust the Best Choice for the Polkadot Blockchain Project?

Decentralized Perpetual Exchange PairEx Announces Beta Trading Competition with Up to 8,888 USD A...

DFund AI: Staking Multiplier Contest

Commit to Win USDT | SuperEx Medium Event Phase 2 Coming Soon

TRON DAO Launches Podcast Interviewing Crypto Policy and Regulation Experts

무료 뉴스레터에 가입하여 매일 최신 암호화폐 소식을 받아보세요!